Saturday, October 30, 2010

Motor Sing:Prosedure tukar nama 2

Ok guys, nie apa yg aku baru dpt in BLACK-N-WHITE setelah aku menulis kpd dorang semalam, at least better than when hear verbally from the officer. Things may changed in the future, aku tak tau :dontknow: .

In short, alamat di-SGP diPERLUKAN. So, sesiapa yg ada kawan / saudara mcm ISI dgn KUKU kat SGP, bolehlah cuba, kalau berhajat. Dtg sendiri utk buat penukaran tersebut is the best. Masa yg diperlukan utk perkara2 tersebut, mungkin memerlukan dalam 2 – 3 jam secara keseluruhan, utk buat insurance, antar inspection sekali kalau perlu, kalau tak perlu ok lah, tak payah. Pastu ke LTA utk tukar nama (lebih baik dtg bersama owner yg kita nak beli motor tersebut, pasal IC dorang pun di-perlukan jugak).

Read more...

Motor Sing:Prosedure tukar nama

Kalau nak beli moto kat S'pore make sure: 1. Nama tukar dgn nama sendiri dalam geran moto. 2. Insurans pun nama sendiri and guna alamat sendiri yg kat M'sia. Ada org kata tak boleh..sebenarnya boleh. 2nd rider tu kalau boleh letak la nama member2 kita kat M'sia. Jgn guna nama org S'pore. Kalau banyak duit boleh beli polisi insuran 1st party (Comprensive) or 2nd party. Kat S'pore ada insurans 2nd party. 3. Kalau boleh elakkan guna khidmat pintu belakang utk buat urusan seperti inspection, roadtax dsb sbb ada kes yang kena tipu oleh runner.

Read more...

Thursday, September 30, 2010

2003 Yamaha FJR1300 vs. Honda ST1300

Source:http://www.ridermagazine.com/output.cfm?id=142849

2003 Yamaha FJR1300 vs. Honda ST1300
Battle of the light-heavyweights.
Bill Stermer
Rider Report
Email this article to a friend!
Kevin Wing / Rider Report

There’s nothing like a major sporting event to stir the blood: The World Series, Super Bowl, Stanley Cup Finals, NBA Finals, World Cup or a good prize fight. By matching the new 2003 Honda ST1300 with Yamaha’s new FJR1300, we have motorcycling’s equivalent of a good light-heavyweight fight.

Going toe-to-toe here are two new models, each with a proud lineage. Each wants the title, and carries a load of the good technical stuff. They float like butterflies, sting like B-52s. Both are at the top of their game.

The 2003 Honda ST1300 ABS and Yamaha FJR1300 utilize different styles, like the classic boxer-vs.-puncher bout. The ABS-model Honda enters this fray wielding technology and tonnage to spare. Its focus is on luxurious long-distance comfort through adjustable rider seating, a huge range of windshield adjustability, anti-lock linked braking and suspension quality. Yamaha’s strategy is a hard-edged road burner with a less-is-more philosophy: more brute power, but less in terms of weight, price and level of luxury. The more Spartan Yamaha’s only counter to the above is an electric windshield, albeit one that offers much less range and protection. We’ll provide the front-row seat as to which bike works best for your needs.

Advertisement
Because we’ve already covered each of these new machines extensively in recent road tests, the FJR1300 in the August 2002 edition and the ST1300 the following month, here we’ll start with a brief review, then take them on the road to let them slug it out.

Rider Report

Lineage

The Honda ST1300 is an update of the ST1100 that first appeared as a 1990 model and, with revisions, lasted through 2002. It was known for its smooth power, supple suspension, major avoirdupois, 7.4-gallon fuel tank and high gearing. Though still powered by a longitudinal, liquid-cooled DOHC, four-valve V-4, the new ST1300 now displaces 1,261cc with a 10.8:1 compression ratio, and utilizes PGM fuel injection.

The Yamaha FJR1300 is an update of the line of big air-cooled, four-cylinder road burners, the FJ1100 that first appeared in 1984, and the 1986 FJ1200 that lasted through 1993. The new 1,298cc model retains the in-line, transverse, DOHC four-cylinder layout with four-valve heads, but is now an all-new engine with liquid cooling and Mitsubishi electronic fuel injection. Both utilize shaft final drive.

Price

Rider Report

Though these bikes are both 1300-class, four-cylinder sport tourers with driveshafts, fairings, removable saddlebags and electrically adjustable windshields, the price differential makes this something less than an apples-to-apples comparison. Yamaha’s FJR1300 is available as a single model with an electrically adjusted windshield for an MSRP of $11,499 (we have heard rumors that for 2004 the standard ‘03 bags will become optional and the bike’s price remain the same or increase). The Honda ST1300 is available both as a standard machine ($12,999), the shield of which is only manually adjustable, and an ABS model ($14,499), which is the one we tested, featuring anti-lock brakes and an electrically adjustable shield. OK, let’s get to work.

Performance

Start them up and each four-cylinder engine is a marvel of smoothness and power. Out on the road the Yamaha feels aggressive, like a big-inch supersport that grew a fairing and bags. The Honda, by contrast, seems designed from the beginning as a sport tourer. Its pleasing mechanical purr becomes a snarl in the upper rpm ranges. While the Yamaha peaks at 124.5 rear-wheel horsepower at 7,850 rpm and puts out 90.1 pounds-feet of torque at 6,700, the Honda cranks out 111.3 peak rear-wheel horsepower at 7,700 rpm, and makes 83.6 pounds-feet of torque at 6,100 rpm. Both have steep horsepower graph lines and hugely broad powerbands, but the Yamaha’s torque curve has some rolling hills in it, while the Honda’s is as flat as Nebraska.

Roll-ons are a good measure of how midrange power interacts with gear ratios and weight. The lighter, more powerful FJR pulls away smartly from the Honda during third-gear roll-ons at 3,000 and 4,000 rpm. At 5,000 rpm, however, the Honda is coming into its power range and hangs much closer. In fifth-gear roll-ons, again, the FJR leaves the ST flat.

While the FJR, with its dual gear-driven counterbalancers, is acceptably smooth through most of its rev range, one high-speed romp left a tester with numb hands. The Honda, also with dual counterbalancers and slightly higher gearing, was always a gentleman in terms of engine vibes. However, excessive driveline lash and engine heat on the rider’s legs were annoyances on the Honda, while the Yamaha’s five-speed shifts well, the Honda’s shifts superbly.

Wind Protection

The first requisite of a sport tourer is long-distance comfort, a balance of wind protection, smoothness, ergo-nomics and seating comfort. Both of these machines offer good-sized fairings with adjustable windshields. The Yamaha’s is electrically operated by means of a thumb-operated pushbutton over a range of 4.6 inches vertically, and a 20-degree angle. While it offers adequate protection, we recommend the optional shield that is 4 inches taller and 2 wider. The standard-model Honda’s shield is fixed in place, but offers 2.3 inches of manual adjustment by repositioning the shield on its mounting brackets.

The shield on the ABS-model Honda is electrically adjustable up to 7.4 inches vertically and a 13-degree angle, and it can also be manually repositioned. As it rises from the low position, the wind at first comes over the top of the shield, then around the sides where it pushes the rider forward. The wind tends to be noisy until the shield’s top is at or near eye level, where the ST1300 rider sits comfortably in a pocket of still air. With its greater height and adjustability range, and because it sits closer to the rider, the Honda’s shield offers greater wind protection.

Seating Comfort

A multiadjustable rider’s portion of the seat gives the Honda rider not only three heights within a range of 1.2 inches vertically, but it also slides 1 inch fore-and-aft and adjusts for slant. We average-sized riders were able to find a very suitable position. The Yamaha, though its seat is non-adjustable, was very satisfactory to our staff, the right blend of cush with firmness, and with a fixed but nicely low height that makes the bike easy to paddle around.

Saddlebags

Both bikes come standard with hard-shell, lockable, easily removable saddlebags, and both look better with their bags in place. Each bag will hold a full-face helmet. Outwardly, the Honda’s bags appear to be larger and more fully integrated into the bodywork. However, what appears to be extra room toward the front is really quite shallow and of little use. The Honda’s also lack hold-down straps.

The Yamaha’s bags appear to be more stuck-on than integrated, yet hold approximately the same amount as the Honda’s and utilize convenient hold-down straps. The Honda’s remove and attach slightly more easily, and their latches work better. The Yamaha’s boxlike shape make them easier to pack. Each has a luggage rack, but only Yamaha offers an accessory top trunk.

Suspension/Brakes

These big bikes just beg to be ridden fast, and for that you’re going to want a capable set of suspenders. The FJR’s fully adjustable 48mm fork is certainly compliant. Its single rear shock offers two-position spring preload, and is adjustable for rebound damping. At very aggressive speeds, you may wish for more firmness and less fork dive. Still, for 95 percent of your sport-touring needs, it’s right where you want it.

The ST’s single rear shock is adjustable for spring preload and rebound damping, and offers a very solid feel with good control and damping. Despite its non-adjustable, 45mm cartridge fork, the ST delivers that rare plush/controlled feel, and throws in remarkable anti-dive qualities to boot.

The latter is partly because of the Honda’s linked braking system; using either the front lever or the rear pedal activates the stoppers at both ends. Through a proportional control valve, the majority of braking force is delivered to whichever brake was actuated with more force. A delay valve in the fork slows initial braking response to minimize fork dive, and it all works very well.

Our test ST was equipped with anti-lock brakes, which of course can be paint-savers (or better) under tricky traction conditions. It provided quick, short, secure stops on a variety of surfaces. The Yamaha’s brakes, though off the R1 sportbike, did not offer quite the bite we wished, and the rear locked too easily.

Handling

Perhaps the most remarkable difference between these bikes is in their handling. The FJR, with its 26 degrees of rake, 4.3 inches of trail and 60.6-inch wheelbase, turns by means of aggressive inputs from the rider’s upper body and pressure on the handlebars. It loves fast sweepers but demands work in tight turns. The Honda, by contrast, combines its shorter 58.7-inch wheelbase with a 26-degree rake and 3.9 inches of trail. These, along with the new lower, more forward-weight bias and tire choice, result in much more responsive, relatively low-effort steering despite the bike being 81 pounds heavier than the Yamaha. With a swing of the rider’s hips the Honda delights in tight turns.

Passenger Accommodations

A major consideration for couples is how well a prospective ride treats its co-rider. A passenger aboard the Yamaha finds a relatively short rear seat that tucks him or her into the rider and forces the knees out to the sides. The seat is firm, and the windblast relatively unaffected by the position of the windscreen.

Rider Report

The Honda’s passenger has roomier accommodations, on a cushier seat, with the feet lower and more relaxed. They experience a similar amount of benefit as the adjustable shield slides up and down. Load capacity is 415 pounds on the Yamaha, and 395 on the Honda.

Range

With these two silver bullets the lighter, more powerful Yamaha burned a gallon every 38.4 miles, while the porkier Honda offered 42.6 miles per gallon on the same ride. With its 6.6-gallon tank the Yamaha offers a very respectable range of 253 miles per tank. A 5.5-gallon conventional tank on the Honda, combined with another 2.2 gallons below the seat, delivers a remarkable range of 328 miles. That should be enough for anyone’s loneliest road.

The Little Things

Two small fairing compartments, one lockable, and a larger underseat area, allow the ST1300 rider to bring along perhaps two pairs of midweight gloves, a U-lock and some road food. It also offers hidden tipover bars, two helmet hooks, a 660-watt alternator and electric headlight adjuster—but no available trunk.

The FJR1300 offers a U-lock/glove compartment, no helmet hooks and a 490-watt alternator. Both have centerstands and catalysts. According to their makers, the Yamaha meets U.S. and California 2006 emissions standards; the Honda meets 2008 standards.

Rider Report

Split Decision

It’s no cop-out to say that each of these bikes is a winner. Which you choose will depend upon your performance/luxury/price balance. If you invested heavily in dot.coms, Worldcom and Enron stocks, and are just scraping by, the Yamaha’s 20 percent price advantage makes it an easy call. It is also the slugger, the sportier of the two, and at 635 pounds wet weighs 81 pounds less than the 716-pound Honda. You can certainly feel that weight as you paddle around the parking lot, but in turns it’s less of a factor.

If on the other hand you like sporty riding but have come to prefer it mixed with some degree of luxury, as long as you’re willing to pay the price to obtain it the Honda’s quick steering response more than makes up for the weight difference. With its better weather protection and well-controlled, squash-butt comfort, the Honda ST1300 is the finesse fighter.

So what will it be, great performance with some luxury, or luxury with a good deal of performance? If your sport-touring preferences lean toward the former, and you like your bikes leaner, meaner and less expensive, remember these three little letters: FJR. Or if you can justify it, choose the Honda ST1300. Stay tuned for long-term reports on both bikes ASAP.

2003 Honda ST1300

Rider Report

Base Price: $12,999, $14,999 w/ ABS

Engine Type: Liquid-cooled, long. 90-degree V-4, DOHC, 4 vales per cyl.

Displacement: 1,261cc

Bore x Stroke: 78.0 x 66.0mm

Transmission: 5-speed, hydraulically actuated wet clutch

Final Drive: Shaft, 2.833:1

Wheelbase: 58.7 in.

Rake/Trail: 26 degrees, 3.9 in.

Seat Height: 30.5, 31.1 & 31.7 in.

Wet Weight: 716 lbs.

Fuel Capacity: 7.7 gals., warning light on last 1.2 gal.

Average mpg: 42.6



2003 Yamaha FJR1300

Base Price: $11,499

Engine Type: Liquid-cooled, transverse in-line four, DOHC, 4 valves per cyl.

Displacement: 1,298cc

Bore x Stroke: 79.0 x 66.2mm

Transmission: 5-speed, hydraulically actuated wet clutch

Final Drive: Shaft, 2.773:1

Wheelbase: 60.6 in.

Rake/Trail: 26 degrees/ 4.3 in.

Seat Height: 31.7 in.

Wet Weight: 635 lbs.

Fuel Capacity: 6.6 gals., warning light on last 1.3 gal.

Average mpg: 38.4

Monday, September 13, 2010

Keperluan untuk beli motor Singapore

Keperluan untuk beli motor Singapore
1.Lesen Antarabangsa
-boleh dibuat di JPJ di sempadan dengan harga rm150/year
-sebelum buat lesen antarabangsa ini,lesen Malaysia perlu hidup paling kurang setahun.So.seeloknya hidupkan 2 tahun(..senang cerita)
-tujuan dibuat lesen antarabangsa ini adalah kerana untuk tukar nama motor dan tujuan insuran motor.
-kedai motor singapore perlukan lesen antarabangsa untuk motor itu dijual pada kita.

-bawak 2-3 keping gambar passport utk buat lesen antarabangsa ini

2.COE
-seeloknya hidupkan untuk 10tahun..kosnya SD1000=RM2360/per 10year

3.Insuran
-SD300=RM708/year

4.Road Tax
600cc-->SD150=RM354/year
1300cc--->SD450=RM1040/year

5.Inspection
-SD17=RM40/year
-pemeriksaan dilakukan di puspakom Singapore(lebih kurang ler..)

6.Kita perlukan alamat di Singapore untuk beli motor Singapore.
-Jika tidak ada alamat di Singapore,boleh pakai alamat kedai motor untuk surat menyurat.

So anda sendiri boleh totalkan kos setahun untuk pakai motor Singapore ini.

Sekian Terima Kasih
-PG

Wednesday, September 8, 2010

Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird 1998

98 Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird specificationsHonda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird 1998


1998 Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird photo
Picture credits - Jack Edwards. Click to submit more pictures.
Show big 1998 Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird imageShow more 1998 Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird images
1998 Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird

More pictures...

Discuss this bike
Rate this motorbike
This bike's rating
Write a review

Sell this motorcycle
Such bikes for sale

Tip a friend
List related bikes



General information
Model:Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird
Year:1998
Category:Sport touring
Rating:78.9 out of 100. Show full rating and compare with other bikes
Engine and transmission
Displacement:1137.00 ccm (69.38 cubic inches)
Engine type:In-line four, four-stroke
Power:164.00 HP (119.7 kW)) @ 10000 RPM
Torque:124.00 Nm (12.6 kgf-m or 91.5 ft.lbs) @ 7250 RPM
Top speed:295.0 km/h (183.3 mph)
Valves per cylinder:4
Cooling system:Liquid
Gearbox:6-speed
Transmission type,
final drive:
Chain
Chassis, suspension, brakes and wheels
Front brakes:Dual disc
Rear brakes:Single disc
Physical measures and capacities
Dry weight:223.0 kg (491.6 pounds)
Power/weight ratio:0.7354 HP/kg
Seat height:810 mm (31.9 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Other specifications
Starter:Electric
Further information
Parts and accessoriesCheck out parts and accessories from our partners.
Ask questionsJoin the 98 Honda CBR 1100 XX Super Blackbird discussion group.
Insurance, loans, testsCheck out insurance here. Search the web for dealers, loan costs, tests, customizing, etc.
Related bikesList related bikes for comparison of specs

Macamana nak beli motor singapura?

Source:http://selesamotorsport.blogspot.com/search?updated-max=2010-07-14T10:42:00-07:00&max-results=7
Anda perlukan passport antarabangsa untuk memasuki negara singa dengan bayaran RM 100 untuk tempoh 2 tahun, jika beli dengan kami tak perlu buat passport sebab kami yang akan masuk dan bawa motor balik ke Johor. Buat lesen antarbangsa di JPJ berdekatan dengan bayaran RM 150 setahun, sediakan 2 keping gambar berukuran pasport dan lesen Malaysia anda mestilah mempunyai tempoh sah lebih setahun. Sekiranya anda tidak mempunyai lesen antarabangsa pihak kedai motor tidak akan dapat membuat insurans atas nama anda dan membuat tukarnama. Motor dan insuran adalah atas nama anda dan alamat surat menyurat gunakan alamat kedai motor sekiranya anda tidak mempunyai alamat di sana. Perlu diingat anda tidak akan mendapat geran seperti di Malaysia kerana geran di Singapura adalah secara maya iaitu anda boleh melihat secara online di internet. https://vrl.lta.gov.sg/lta/vrl/JSP/errorFrame.jsp?theURL=/JSP/serviceNotAvailable.jsp&userType=P&a=1277231689636

Selain membayar tukarnama, cukai jalan dan insurans anda juga perlu mengetahui bilakah COE motor akan tamat (motor 2nd hand). Setiap COE adalah 10 tahun dan anda boleh renew COE sekiranya telah tamat tempoh 10 tahun. Sebagai contoh sekiranya anda ingin membeli motor 2nd hand tahun 2001 maka anda perlu renew COE pada tahun 2011. Harga untuk renew COE berbeza2 mengikut tahun, mungkin SING 600 dolar atau SING 100 dolar.

Read more...

Monday, September 6, 2010

Bandit1200s spec

Source:

05 Suzuki Bandit 1200 S specificationsSuzuki Bandit 1200 S 2005



2005 Suzuki Bandit 1200 S photo
Picture credits - Suzuki. Click to submit more pictures.


2005 Suzuki Bandit 1200 S

Discuss this bike
Rate this motorbike
This bike's rating
2 reviews available
Write a review

Sell this motorcycle
Such bikes for sale

Tip a friend
List related bikes



Suzuki's profilation of this bike
This standard-styled machine features an aerodynamic, aggressively styled fairing with bright projector-beam headlights and protective windscreen. Other highlights include a comfortable seat and stylish tail section, lightweight components and a powerful four-stroke engine.

General information
Model:Suzuki Bandit 1200 S
Year:2005
Category:Allround
Rating:77.2 out of 100. Show full rating and compare with other bikes
Price as new (MSRP):US$ 7399. Prices depend on country, taxes, accessories, etc.
Engine and transmission
Displacement:1157.00 ccm (70.60 cubic inches)
Engine type:In-line four, four-stroke
Compression:9.5:1
Bore x stroke:79.0 x 59.0 mm (3.1 x 2.3 inches)
Valves per cylinder:4
Fuel system:Carburettor
Fuel control:DOHC
Cooling system:Oil & air
Gearbox:5-speed
Transmission type,
final drive:
Chain
Chassis, suspension, brakes and wheels
Front suspension:Telescopic, oil damped, preload adjustable
Rear suspension:Link-type suspension, 7-way adjustable preload, 4-way adjustable rebound
Front tyre dimensions:120/70-ZR17
Rear tyre dimensions:180/55-ZR17
Front brakes:Double disc
Rear brakes:Single disc
Physical measures and capacities
Dry weight:221.0 kg (487.2 pounds)
Seat height:790 mm (31.1 inches) If adjustable, lowest setting.
Overall height:1,220 mm (48.0 inches)
Overall length:2,070 mm (81.5 inches)
Overall width:765 mm (30.1 inches)
Ground clearance:130 mm (5.1 inches)
Wheelbase:1,430 mm (56.3 inches)
Fuel capacity:20.00 litres (5.28 gallons)
Other specifications
Color options:Blue/White
Further information
Parts and accessoriesCheck out parts and accessories from our partners.
Ask questionsJoin the 05 Suzuki Bandit 1200 S discussion group.
Insurance, loans, tests Check out insurance here. Search the web for dealers, loan costs, tests, customizing, etc.
Related bikesList related bikes for comparison of specs



Sell or buy used bikes?

Bikez.biz has an efficient motorcycle classifieds. Ads are free. Click here to sell a used 2005 Suzuki Bandit 1200 S or advertise any other MC for sale. You can list all 2005 Suzuki Bandit 1200 S available and also sign up for e-mail notification when such bikes are advertised in the future. Bikez has a high number of users looking for used bikes.

Before you buy this bike, you should view the list of related motorbikes Compare technical specs. Look at photos. And check out the rating of the bike's engine performance, repair costs, etc.

Bandit1200s review

Source:http://www.motorcycle.com/manufacturer/suzuki/2001-suzuki-bandit-1200s-16413.html
Los Angeles, July 18, 2000 -- A normal part of any new bike intro is a photo session somewhere around the mid to late portion of the day's ride. This particular intro saw Tom Riles behind the lens, pointing away at various riders taking their turns through bends in the road until, in one particularly off-camber and nasty corner, Master Riles got the living stuff scared out of him when we came towards him at a high rate of speed sounding like we were towing an anvil along behind us; complete with sparking light show and a little bob-and-weave of the chassis to add just a little more drama to the moment.

No worry, Tom, we're professionals; and that's just the foot pegs carving a little niche for themselves in the pavement while the

front end sticks to the road and the Macadam 90X tires let us know pretty much everything but the half-life of the pebbles they're coming in contact with. Granted, this is no racebike - or even a real sport bike when you get down to it - but for a semi-faired standard, it does a remarkable impression from time to time, given a bit of impetus from, lets say, a photographer in close proximity with a loaded camera pointed your way?

What's so impressive about this Bandit compared to previous iterations is not so much what it does well, as much as what it doesn't do:

The mirrors don't turn your rearward view into something that resembles a kaleidescope at anything above idle; the minimalist-looking fairing doesn't buffet your helmet until the paint job starts flaking off; the motor doesn't buzz your hands to the point that you're willing to clamp them in a vice just to see if there's a chance of ever recovering some feeling in them; and the front end doesn't turn to junk after 600 miles of fun - which is what this bike delivers far more frequently and in much greater quantity than you'd ever suspect.

When we sampled Suzuki's Bandit 600S a few months ago we were please with the bike, but not overly impressed. It was a good commuter and could pull off mild sport duty pretty well, but the motor was a bit on the wheezy side and, paired with an obnoxious buzz, not all that fun to do the highway drone on should there be ample mileage between your chosen set of curves. We expected similar things from the 1200 but, once again Suzuki has surprised us with a bike that is, pardon the cliche, more than the sum of its parts.

Bandit 1200 sales started off at a rather lowly 18,160 units in 1996 only to surpass the 60,000 mark for 1999 which is a three-fold increase in only three years, but Suzuki doesn't plan on stopping there. Having done extensive market research, they found that the average Bandit buyer is 35 to 44 years of age, has over 15 years of riding experience and uses the bike as a secondary vehicle primarily for sport touring duty which goes a long way towards explaining the focus of the Bandit's changes. At a retail price of $7,399 (an increase of only $150 US Dollars), it's no surprise that 87 percent of buyers say their number one reason for choosing the Bandit is value. But, thankfully, a neutered price tag does not come at the expense of diminished fun.

The design goal for the new Bandit was to, "maintain the Bandit's originality and distinctive character while refining performance and features." There was a paradox created in the execution of these parameters in that the design team wanted not only sportier performance, but a comfortable ride as well; the two of which rarely, if ever, go hand in hand.

"Yeah, baaaby. This bike is all about me. I am this bike on so many levels it's scary."

Suzuki hopes that they addressed most of the complaints from earlier models with this Year 2001 Bandit 1200S, starting with the larger fuel tank capacity. The new model carries 20 liters which is a one liter increase over the previous model. While this is definitely a good thing in the long run, a few of us on the intro noted a slightly more top-heavy feel to the (fully fueled) bike when compared - seat of the pants - to the previous version. As for the other improvements, there were fewer side-effects than with the larger gas tank.

The main targets with the motor were to improve what was not only sluggish throttle response, but carburetion that was excessively lean and was sometimes surge-happy when cruising along at certain RPM. Along the way, Suzuki felt it wise to empower the old mill with a few more foot-pounds of torque as well as some more horsepower at low and mid-range speeds, and who are we to argue with a notion like that?

Again, a caveat in that Suzuki - while addressing the lean surging - would attempt to clean up emissions even further, seemingly leading to even worse surging. But Suzuki was able to attain their lower emissions goal while not only eliminating most - if not all - of the surging and what was previously a rather wicked flat spot in the power with the help a new throttle position sensor (TPS) on the Mikuni BSR36 carburetors. Mated with ignition timing maps which are different not only from the previous year's version, but from each other as well. The number two and three cylinders and the number one and four cylinders have different maps that vary dependent upon throttle opening as well as engine RPM.

Even more power was found by changing the cam profiles and a few changes were made to stand up to the added oomph as well as to ensure longevity. The new oil cooler has grown from 280 mm tall to 355 mm tall while maintaining the same width which should allow the engine to make incrementally more power and last a bit longer. There's also a clutch release cylinder which grew from 35.7 mm in diameter to 38.1 mm that, coupled with stronger clutch springs should make for a clutch assembly that will be able to stand up to a few aftermarket add-ons without much in the way of fanfare. Only a few whiny people commented on a perceived increase in the force required to pull in the clutch lever. But they're weak and you're not. Right? Aaargh.


Adopting a similar system to that of Yamaha's Air Induction System (AIS), Suzuki has been fitting its Pulsed Secondary Air Injection System (PAIR) to California-bound Bandits, Hayabusas and GSX-Rs, that will now be standard issue on all Bandits in all markets. The PAIR system does not effect power output but it does add a few extra pounds to a machine which could already stand to lose a few pounds.

In Suzuki's efforts to endow the latest Bandit with "better stability and cornering performance," a few key dimensions have been tweaked. Unfortunately, American Suzuki doesn't have all the details as to what has been changed with the chassis so we can only give you a glimpse into what is the catalyst for a noteworthy increase in sporting performance.

The wheelbase has been shortened by five millimeters and now measures 1,430 mm, helped by the reduction in trail by three millimeters to 104 mm. To quicken steering the caster has been decreased by 0.2 degrees, and to help keep rider weight and overall mass lower to the tarmac, the seat height was reduced by 45 mm to 790 mm. This seat provides not only wonderful support for burning through consecutive tanks of gas, but also enough firmness to allow mobility when shifting body weight in the twisties. Unfortunately, the seat cover looks like something off of a mid-eighties Volvo station wagon; but it goes well with the metallic silver paint on our bike whose enormous glitter flakes remind us of this girl who dances at this seedy little joint down the road from our offices.

All we know about the changes to the front suspension so far is that it received fork tube guards. As for the rear, there's now a movable gas/oil separator in the shock. The front end features only pre-load adjustment while the rear features pre-load as well as rebound adjustment. Though that doesn't seem like anything substantial, the new Bandit feels surprisingly planted on twisty roads when you chose to elevate the speeds to the point that the footpegs start dragging just before picking up the throttle and whooshing out of the apex of a turn. The cornering clearance is ample as long as you ride the bike like a sport-tourer even though, with a good rider aboard, El Bandito can catch a far sportier bike with its newfound cornering prowess and strengthened motor which is about as smooth as any inline motor of this size has a right to be. Above 85 mph this thing is turbine smooth and makes triple-digit cruising law-breakingly simple.


Wednesday, August 25, 2010

Motor Singapore dan COE

Source:http://selesamotorsport.blogspot.com/
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
Q:Bolehkah motor dari Singapore di pandu di Malaysia?

A:Boleh.



Q:Apakah syarat-syaratnya?

A:1. Kenderaan telah didaftar di Singapore 2. Mempunyai cukai jalan yang sah 3. Mempunyai perlindungan insuran



Q:Apakah yang diperlukan untuk membeli kenderaan dari Singapore selain duit?

A:Lesen Antarabangsa yang boleh dibuat di JPJ dengan bayaran RM150 setahun. Sertakan 2 keping gambar semasa permohonan (bawa 3 lebih baik).

Read more...

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Honda CBR1100XX vs. Kawasaki ZZ-R1200

Source:http://www.motorcycle.com/shoot-outs/honda-cbr1100xx-vs-kawasaki-zzr1200-15400.html
Break out the Good Silverware

Torrance, California, September 29, 2002 --

These two lovelies were both cutting-edge big bikes built for the top-speed battles of the mid-1990s, until a bike named after a falcon called the Hayabusa came along and changed motorcycle history like only a small percentage of models ever do. It effectively relegated bikes like the venerable Blackbird and the ZX-11 (aka ZZ-R1100 in Europe) to second-tier status and opened up the market for other wacky shenanigans from Nippon, like the ZX-12R and the GSX-R1000.

One of the side effects of all this activity was an unofficial high-speed moratorium put into effect in 2000 with a lid of 300kph/186mph rumored to be the "gentlemen's agreement" among the major bike manufacturers (much like the 155mph top speed limit agreed upon by most European car makers).

But I digress: For what purpose do dinosaurs like the Dos Equis and the Zee-Zee-R exist, with monsters like the Hayabusa and ZX-12R stomping around?

"These bikes have become de facto sport-touring bikes, or Grand Touring (GT) bikes."

Honda's continuing refinement of the venerable CBR1100XX and Kawasaki's further shift towards the sport-touring sector with the redesign of the ZX-11 into the ZZ-R1200 reflects this. The Honda is a smooth, sophisticated bike that screams refinement. Its styling is still sharp, and combined with its smart silver paint scheme, it gathers many compliments and admiring glances.

The dash is a myriad of digital readouts and the engine is as smooth as "I Can't Believe it's Not Butter."

Compared to the Honda, the new ZZ-R seems unrefined and a bit industrial at first glance--not surprising, as it's built by a corporation that also builds bridges and commercial gas turbines. Analog gauges stare at you as if from an old fighter plane's cockpit, the engine is guttural and buzzy, and the styling is still open to debate. But things start to make sense after you spend some time on the bike and you notice details that Honda failed to address even in their years of refinement. Things like a handy little U-lock storage space, an easy-to-reach rear preload adjuster and front preload that is adjustable in the first place, start making me wonder why the XX is 500 clams more?

Well, probably for things like a counterbalanced engine, fuel injection, the entertaining digital dash and the linked braking system--all of which I am content to live without. Not that I'm a technology-hating Luddite--far from it, and in fact, I consider myself much more of a technophile. Sure the big Kawasaki is a little buzzy, but as long as you keep the revs above 5000 rpm on the freeway and don't lug it down, you'll avoid the onset of hand-tingling numbness. (To accomplish this means either cruising above 90mph or dropping down a gear; I'll leave the choice up to you.)

The Honda's engine, on the other hand, is smooth everywhere, with lots-o-power at your fingertips. The fuel injection of the XX also carries certain advantages, such as quick startup and rapid warm-up time, but we prefer the carbureted power delivery characteristics of the ZZ-R. It's not as snatchy as the Honda, and overall a little more natural and fluid feeling. When news of this bike's release came out, the dreaded phrase "tuned for midrange performance" was part of the propaganda, but as it turns out this engine still feels fairly peaky for a 1200--with a whole lotta mojo everywhere on the tachometer's diabolically orange glowing face.
The only downside is that it can trick you into how potent it really is and how fast you really are going on the open road. It really doesn't want to cruise below 90-- nice for covering ground, but potentially not so great for the 'ol driving record.

Much like the Honda's FI compared to the Kawasaki's rack of carbs, the digital vs. analog theme continues between these two bikes. The dash of the Honda is well-designed and informative, but also a bit cluttered and distracting.

The Kawasaki's old school analog pieces provide every bit of pertinent information you need instantly and easily, even if the numbers on the speedo are a bit crowded. As much as "digital" has become the magical buzzword of our era, analog is still not a bad word as long as it's in the right context.

"When it gets to bikes this fast, it's splitting hairs to try and compare which one's faster."

One item we could live without on the Honda's parts list (and something that we'd gladly trade for front preload adjustability and easy rear suspension adjustment) is the Linked Brake System. It's a normal journo gripe which we tried to avoid but can't. Around town the system is fairly transparent and not very noticeable, but get it in a backroad environment and it can be unsettling for riders who like to settle the front or rear independently going into corners, which would be nearly all of us. The Kawasaki's brakes aren't really fantastic or anything, but they do their job predictably and reliably, and in general make you wonder why Honda goes to all the trouble? Honda's ABS is fantastic on models that have it, but LBS? It's tough to figure out the motivation at the end of the day.

Speaking of things like corners and backroads, the opinions formulated after taking these bikes through a variety of conditions were surprising. The Double X is quite nice around town; calm, composed, and with a smaller feel than the Kawasaki it's easier to ride, but that's not what these bikes are built for.

Sure, they go hellaciously fast: Unsanctioned blasts on overhead carpool lanes and across the desert confirmed something that we all know to be true (*cough* 175 indicated, cough cough!).

When it gets to bikes this fast, it's splitting hairs to try and compare which one's faster (170mph vs. 175, how fast do you need to get to that dentist appointment?). That said, the Kawasaki's monstrously powerful and torquey engine easily pulls away from the Honda at supra-triple-digit speeds. In the midrange, too, the ZZ-R lunges ahead from 5000 rpm while the Honda sort of eases into its harness.

So what happens when it comes time for the straightline fun to end and make that inevitable bend in the road?

On the first such backroad outing I was on the Zed, behind Speedy McSpeed Calvin on the EcksEcks and thought, Oh just you wait, I'll catch up with you when I get on the Honda! Hah hah hah hahhhh... but to my shock and dismay, after we switched bikes I found myself dropping even further behind than normal and pining away for the rough and tumble Kawasaki.

This was the complete opposite of what we'd expected; after riding the bikes on short trips around LA I thought for sure the Blackbird (Silverbird?) would spank the ZZ-R in the backroads and twisty bits. It sure feels smaller and more sportbike-ish: lighter, narrower, a forward seating position, more weight on the wrists, and narrow handlebars. But the Kawasaki is a big surprise once you get it on what you would expect to be the Honda's turf. Its girth and weight seem to disappear and it's actually a lot of fun to ride at a sporting pace. Its growling intake makes you want to open the throttle for more visceral reasons than just an onrush of stupid amounts of power and torque. Think of a late model V8 Camaro or Trans Am. The Honda's more like an Acura Integra.

ZZ-R handling is predictable and instills complete trust in its abilities, but it's still surprisingly quick and light. Some of us found ourselves getting into far more "oh-shit" situations on the Honda; things like rippled pavement illustrate the differences. Mr. Honda bounces and complains, but Mr. Kawasaki just seems to jump over it all and laugh in the process. It takes a lot to faze this big machine. Another plus is that its hugeness is a definite advantage on long trips.

"The Kawasaki's bulbous fairing provides great wind protection for gangly frames, and was incredibly comfortable during a nonstop run across the desert to Las Vegas for an overnight jaunt to see the "Art of the Motorcycle" exhibit."

The wide seat spreads out your weight evenly, and makes even butts with not much padding feel perfectly comfy.

Compared to the CBR, it's a rolling La-Z-Boy. Overall, the ZZ-R's like that well-worn Barcalounger in front of your grandpa's TV, and the CBR's more like a firm executive chair. It's relatively plush as far as sportbikes go, but after an extended exploration voyage up the coast on a Sunday afternoon, I was ready to be done.

My butt, wrists and neck had enough by the time I'd put in over six hours on the Honda. The compactness that makes it feel better in the city doesn't provide as much wind protection at elevated intercity speeds, the forward and compact ergoes weren't so kind on my freakishly long extremities, and the narrower and firmer seat wasn't as nice either.

One drawback of all the horsepower these bikes develop is the production of a lot of waste heat that has to be dumped, and the Honda in particular seems to put off a lot. Riding it around in 90-degree-plus weather with full gear is not a pleasant experience if traffic gums up at all, and in L.A. it always does. As for traffic, lane splitting on either of these bikes is a snap, as they do have a certain presence on the asphalt.

And interestingly enough, I had the opportunity to both be a passenger on the CBR1100XX with JohnnyB at the helm and to carry one for a little while myself. It's actually pretty nice back there, and my relatively inexperienced passenger felt quite secure. However, from the pilot's perspective, I didn't like how the passenger upset the balance of the machine. (Unlike every other Honda designed to carry a passenger, for some inexplicable reason this one makes rear preload adjustment a knuckle-busting affair.)

They're both excellent bikes and fantastic all-around machines, particularly if you have a long commute or live in Montana, where they can take a deep breath, stretch their legs and gallop up to an easy one-thirty for a while. If we've got to pick one, though, it's the ZZ-R1200. It's big, fast and fun to ride. Cool noises waft upward from its mechanical guts, it goes like greased stink, and the engineers really paid attention to all the little details that matter. Nice bike.

Unsolicited Input

John Burns

Just goes to show you. When I first rode the new ZZ-R several months ago, not for long, I was less than impressed. It reminded me of one of my all-time favorite bikes though--the CBR-XX. Comparing the two seemed like an excellent pretext for borrowing one from Honda for awhile. Calvin and the Stickman both loved the Kawasaki immediately. Here's a chance to teach the lads a lesson, I thought. Boys, when the XX gets here, you'll discover what a pile of junk that rehashed Kawasaki is. The XX, lads, is a polished gem, a smooth, swift chariot fit for the moto-sophisticate, and by then they would've wandered off. Um, when I actually put miles on them back to back, I realized the kids are right. It's the Honda's suspension that actually feels a bit overdamped and choppy. And while the ZZ-R engine is a bit coarser, it makes so much more power than the supersmooth Honda, you don't mind a bit. Pardon us for taking such a long time to test the ZZ-R, but I did not expect it would be such a nice `sickle.

Calvin Kim

I came into this test with somewhat of an open mind. I had ridden the XX before, but didn't really remember all the details. The ZZ-R, course is all new. Anyway, when it came time to take one home for the night, I first hoped on the ZZ-R. The growling intake sentiment is right. This thing has cajones and isn't afraid to tell you. I appreciated the remote preload adjuster, and found the dash and ergonomics to be utilitarian and just right for me.

Then came the XX. Talk about smooth, when I was riding the XX, the only thing that I could think of was when turbine-powered aircraft was first introduced to the public. However, the smoothness comes from its counter-balancer equipped engine, not from its suspension, and thats where bikes like these need the smoothness the most.

The ZZR, on the other hand, was just a fun bike. It's a big machine that can be used for just about any sort of task. I like to think of it as a BMW 5-series but on two wheels. That is, I'd think of it that way if you could ignore the buzzing. What wasn't fun, however, was its dyno graph. If you look at it, the Honda makes more power above 7,000 rpm. But during our own straightline testing, the Kawi was superior. I'm thinking the ram air system on the Kawi might be the cause of that. Regardless, I had the most fun on the ZZR through hill, dale and all points in between.


Honda CBR1100XX Kawasaki ZZ-R1200
Engine 1137cc liquid-cooled, 16-valve, DOHC inline four 1164cc liquid-cooled, 16-valve, DOHC inline four
Bore x Stroke (mm) 79.0x58.0 79.0x59.4
Compression Ratio 11.0:1 10.5:1
Ignition Digital
Fuel Delivery EFI 4x Keihin CVKD40, TPS
Transmission 6-spd, wet, multiplate clutch
Suspension, Front 43mm, 4.7" 43mm, 4.8" (P)
Suspension, Rear Mono-shock, 4.7" (P-threaded,R) Mono-shock, 4.8" (P-threaded)
Brakes, Front 310mm, 3 piston 320mm, 4 piston
Brakes, Rear 256mm, 3 piston 250mm, 1 piston
Tires, Front 120/70ZR-17 120/70ZR-17
Tires, Rear 180/55ZR-17 180/55ZR-17
Wheelbase 58.5"/1486mm 59.3"/1506mm
Rake-Trail 25.0°-3.9"/99mm 25.0°-4.16"/106mm
Seat Height 31.75"/806mm 31.50"/800mm
Thumb Height 37.25"/946mm 37.25"/946mm
Thumb-to-Thumb 19.0"/483mm 20.0"/508mm
Fuel Capacity 6.3gal/29L 6.1gal/28L
Fuel Mileage 43mpg 36mpg
Measured Weight (wet) 552lbs/250kg 595lbs/270kg
Available Colors Metallic Silver Galaxy Silver
Suggested Price $10,999 $10,499
  • (P,C,R) denotes adjustable Preload, Compression damping and Rebound dampening.
  • threaded and ramp denotes method of rear shock preload adjustment. Threaded collar, or ramped collar.
  • Front brakes come in pairs. We assume this to be common knowledge so we didn't mention anything about it. If you didn't know this information, don't worry, you're informed as of now.
  • Friday, July 2, 2010

    Suzuki Bandit 1200s

    Source:http://www.sportrider.com/features/146_0208_suzuki_bandit_1200s/index.html
    Whuppin' on hard-core sportbikes with Carry Andrew'sheavily beefed Suzuki Bandit 1200S
    From the June, 2010 issue of Sport Rider
    2002 Suzuki Bandit 1200S

    When it comes to the horsepower aftermarket, one of the most popular engines of the early 1990s to be tweaked and massaged by racing tuners is Suzuki's original air/oil-cooled, four-cylinder motor that powered the GSX-R line from 1985 to 1995. First produced in 750cc form, the lightweight engine responded favorably to various hop-up modifications, spawning a catalog of parts from speed merchants around the world. When the big-bore GSX-R1100 made its debut in 1986, horsepower mavens literally tripped over themselves in their rush to build parts aimed at squeezing even more thrust from the stoutly engineered mill. The onslaught of technology waits for no one, however, and now the only remaining Suzuki to utilize the venerable powerplant is the Bandit 1200.

    Read more...

    Saturday, January 9, 2010

    Blackbird review

    Introduction

    Build with the look of speed and with performance to back it up, the CBR 1100XX Super Blackbird was the fastest production motorcycle when it was launched back in 1996 but afterwards Honda decided to concentrate on obtaining a great sport-touring model as Suzuki and Kawasaki were fighting for those extra mph that would sell a motorcycle much better.

    Read more...

      © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

    Back to TOP